Noam Chomsky and the Willful Ignorance of 9/11

Noam Chomsky and the Willful Ignorance of 9/11 – Posted on November 29, 2013 by Kevin Ryan in his “Dig Within” Blog. Noam Chomsky recently engaged in a smear campaign against Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth by misrepresenting what their efforts are, what they actually say, and their size. By not availing himself to information about 9/11 that is readily available to everyone these many years after the event, and to Chomsky himself after some 30 correspondences with author-researcher Kevin Ryan, it can only be called “willful ignorance” says the former UL chemist who became a 9/11 whistle-blower. Here is the reaction of Kevin Ryan to the unscientific American professor Chomsky’s latest anti-intellectual rant. In his Florida speech Chomsky claimed not to know the basic laws of physics, saying he would defer on that to people with doctorates. Ryan reveals what Chomsky’s gate-keeper game is all about since he has a long history of dismissing deep political conspiracies since the JFK murder-coup. Kevin Ryan is co-founder of The Journal of 9/11 Studies and has a new book out titled “Another Nineteen: Investigating Legitimate 9/11 Suspects”.

Dig Within

In response to a question at the University of Florida recently, Noam Chomsky claimed that there were only “a miniscule number of architects and engineers” who felt that the official account of WTC Building 7 should be treated with skepticism.  Chomsky followed-up by saying, “a tiny number—a couple of them—are perfectly serious.”

If signing your name and credentials to a public petition on the subject means being serious, then Noam Chomsky’s tiny number begins at 2,100, not counting scientists and other professionals. Why would Chomsky make such an obvious exaggeration when he has been presented with contradictory facts many times?

ChomskyI’ve personally had over thirty email exchanges with Chomsky. In those exchanges, he has agreed that it is “conceivable” that explosives might have been used at the WTC. But, he wrote, if that were the case it would have had to be Saddam Hussein or Osama bin Laden who…

View original post 1,036 more words

4 thoughts on “Noam Chomsky and the Willful Ignorance of 9/11

    • It is interesting that you post this document in response to a critique of Noam Chomsky. The answer to your question is that the “basic science” outlined in the doc you present has been refuted many times over since it was presented as the rationale for the disintegration of the World Trade Center towers in 10 seconds time after standing quite a while after the impact of planes and the end of jet fuel fires. If what Eager and Musso claim was true, it would be a first and last time such phenomenon was observed in the entire 100 plus history of steel frame buildings. It’s not a cogent “theory”, and comes off as a well-crafted sinister lie. Your comment was approved for the sake of fairness and open discourse. However, it is utter nonsense as “science”. I refer my readers to the critique offered to the world by the esteemed Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth at for debunking of this document for which the author was likely paid well to write. Watch “9/11 Explosive Evidence: Experts Speak Out”!
      You can find it on YouTube too!

  1. Pingback: “Berkeley Calling” Vic ReBlogs Kevin Ryan on Chomsky | Vic Sadot Music

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s